2004 Honda Civic vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2004 Honda Civic is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Civic (116 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda Civic weights approximately 142 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 144 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Honda Civic | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Honda | Volvo |
| Model | Civic | 220 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1157 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |
