2004 Honda Civic vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2004 Honda Civic is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 118 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda Civic weights approximately 194 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda Civic. (149 Nm). This means 1972 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Honda Civic | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | Civic | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1154 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2480 mm |