2004 Honda CR-V vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2004 Honda CR-V is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2004 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 888 kg more than 2004 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Honda CR-V | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Honda | Lincoln |
| Model | CR-V | Continental |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 2406 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 90 L |
