2004 Honda CR-V vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2004 Honda CR-V is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda CR-V weights approximately 463 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm). This means 2004 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Honda CR-V | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | CR-V | 220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 144 Nm |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1478 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 45 L |