2004 Honda CR-V vs. 1984 Nissan Leopard
To start off, 2004 Honda CR-V is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Nissan Leopard is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Nissan Leopard (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2004 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Leopard should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda CR-V weights approximately 108 kg more than 1984 Nissan Leopard.
Because 2004 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Nissan Leopard. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Nissan Leopard (335 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 1984 Nissan Leopard will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Honda CR-V | 1984 Nissan Leopard | |
Make | Honda | Nissan |
Model | CR-V | Leopard |
Year Released | 2004 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 335 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1478 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |