2004 Honda CR-V vs. 1988 Volvo 760
To start off, 2004 Honda CR-V is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Volvo 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Volvo 760 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Volvo 760 (165 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Volvo 760 should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda CR-V weights approximately 183 kg more than 1988 Volvo 760.
Because 2004 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Volvo 760. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Volvo 760 (240 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda CR-V. (220 Nm). This means 1988 Volvo 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Honda CR-V | 1988 Volvo 760 | |
| Make | Honda | Volvo |
| Model | CR-V | 760 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1335 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2780 mm |
