2004 Honda CR-V vs. 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2004 Honda CR-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace. (89 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace weights approximately 237 kg more than 2004 Honda CR-V.
Because 2004 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace (226 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Honda CR-V | 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
Make | Honda | Toyota |
Model | CR-V | Hi-Ace |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 226 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1478 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1960 mm |