2004 Honda CR-V vs. 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK

To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK (228 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2004 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda CR-V.

Because 2004 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK (300 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda CR-V.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Honda CR-V 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK
Make Honda Mercedes-Benz
Model CR-V SLK
Year Released 2004 2007
Body Type SUV Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2359 cc 2996 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 160 HP 228 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 218 Nm 300 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4090 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2440 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.4 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.2 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 70 L