2004 Honda CR-V vs. 2011 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2011 Subaru Outback is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Subaru Outback (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2004 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Subaru Outback weights approximately 130 kg more than 2004 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Subaru Outback (335 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda CR-V. (220 Nm). This means 2011 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Honda CR-V | 2011 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Honda | Subaru |
Model | CR-V | Outback |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 335 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1648 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 70 L |