2004 Honda CR-V vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda CR-V would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1022 kg more than 2004 Honda CR-V.
Because 2004 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Honda CR-V | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Honda | Fisker |
| Model | CR-V | Karma |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 36 L |
