2004 Honda Element vs. 1971 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 Honda Element is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Honda Element is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Element (153 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1971 Lotus Seven. (85 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Element should accelerate faster than 1971 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda Element weights approximately 943 kg more than 1971 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1971 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Element, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Honda Element (220 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Lotus Seven. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Honda Element will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Lotus Seven. 2004 Honda Element has automatic transmission and 1971 Lotus Seven has manual transmission. 1971 Lotus Seven will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Honda Element will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Honda Element | 1971 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Honda | Lotus |
| Model | Element | Seven |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1971 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 63 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1537 kg | 594 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 34 L |
