2004 Honda Fit vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2004 Honda Fit is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Fit (82 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jeep CJ weights approximately 56 kg more than 2004 Honda Fit.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Honda Fit. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda Fit. (123 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1953 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Honda Fit | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Honda | Jeep |
Model | Fit | CJ |
Year Released | 2004 | 1953 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1335 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2040 mm |