2004 Honda Fit vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2004 Honda Fit is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1960 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Fit (82 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 150 kg more than 2004 Honda Fit.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Honda Fit | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Honda | Toyota |
Model | Fit | Master RR |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1335 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2540 mm |