2004 Honda Fit vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2004 Honda Fit is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2004 Honda Fit. (82 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Honda Fit | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fit | FTO |
Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1335 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2510 mm |