2004 Honda FR-V vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda FR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda FR-V would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2004 Honda FR-V. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda FR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda FR-V weights approximately 157 kg more than 2009 Acura CSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Honda FR-V | 2009 Acura CSX | |
Make | Honda | Acura |
Model | FR-V | CSX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |