2004 Honda FR-V vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda FR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda FR-V would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 1164 kg more than 2004 Honda FR-V.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Honda FR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Honda FR-V | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
| Make | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | FR-V | Avalanche |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1668 cc | 5328 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 316 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 2559 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5621 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1946 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3302 mm |
