2004 Honda FR-V vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda FR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda FR-V would be higher. Both 2004 Honda FR-V and 2013 Mazda 3 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Honda FR-V. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda FR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda FR-V weights approximately 74 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda FR-V. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda FR-V.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Honda FR-V 2013 Mazda 3
Make Honda Mazda
Model FR-V 3
Year Released 2004 2013
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 192 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 91 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 12.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1452 kg 1378 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4595 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 55 L