2004 Honda Logo vs. 1979 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2004 Honda Logo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (220 HP) has 156 more horse power than 2004 Honda Logo. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda Logo.
Because 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (434 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda Logo. (108 Nm). This means 1979 Pontiac Trans Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda Logo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Honda Logo | 1979 Pontiac Trans Am | |
| Make | Honda | Pontiac |
| Model | Logo | Trans Am |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 6555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2750 mm |
