2004 Honda Logo vs. 2012 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda Logo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda Logo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 214 more horse power than 2004 Honda Logo. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda Logo.

Because 2012 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda Logo. (108 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda Logo. 2012 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2004 Honda Logo has manual transmission. 2004 Honda Logo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: