2004 Hyundai Elantra vs. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2004 Hyundai Elantra is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 905 kg more than 2004 Hyundai Elantra.
Because 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Hyundai Elantra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Hyundai Elantra | 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Hyundai | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Elantra | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 81 L |