2004 Hyundai Elantra vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Hyundai Elantra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Hyundai Elantra would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche (316 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2004 Hyundai Elantra. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 2004 Hyundai Elantra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 1391 kg more than 2004 Hyundai Elantra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Hyundai Elantra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche (454 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Hyundai Elantra. (183 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Hyundai Elantra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Hyundai Elantra | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Hyundai | Chevrolet |
Model | Elantra | Avalanche |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 316 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 454 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2586 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5621 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1946 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 119 L |