2004 Hyundai Matrix vs. 1976 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2004 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Datsun 280Z (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2004 Hyundai Matrix. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Datsun 280Z should accelerate faster than 2004 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 25 kg more than 1976 Datsun 280Z.
Because 1976 Datsun 280Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Datsun 280Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Datsun 280Z (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Hyundai Matrix. (143 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1976 Datsun 280Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Hyundai Matrix | 1976 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Hyundai | Datsun |
Model | Matrix | 280Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 143 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |