2004 Hyundai Tiburon vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Hyundai Tiburon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Hyundai Tiburon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Hyundai Tiburon weights approximately 539 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Hyundai Tiburon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Hyundai Tiburon (245 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Hyundai Tiburon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Hyundai Tiburon | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Hyundai | Smart |
| Model | Tiburon | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1379 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.2 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 33 L |
