2004 Infiniti FX vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Infiniti FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Infiniti FX would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2004 Infiniti FX. (315 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2004 Infiniti FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Infiniti FX weights approximately 26 kg more than 2013 Dodge CHARGER.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Infiniti FX. (446 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Infiniti FX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Infiniti FX | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Infiniti | Dodge |
Model | FX | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4494 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 365 HP |
Torque | 446 Nm | 536 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 72 L |