2004 Infiniti FX vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Infiniti FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Infiniti FX would be higher. At 4,494 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Infiniti FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Infiniti FX (315 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (286 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Infiniti FX should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 159 kg more than 2004 Infiniti FX.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Infiniti FX (446 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (353 Nm). This means 2004 Infiniti FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Infiniti FX | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Infiniti | Jeep |
Model | FX | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4494 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 286 HP |
Torque | 446 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 2114 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 93 L |