2004 Isuzu Axiom vs. 1979 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Axiom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (250 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1979 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Axiom weights approximately 963 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (334 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda RX-2. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Axiom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Axiom | 1979 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Axiom | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 158 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1923 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |