2004 Isuzu Axiom vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Axiom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (250 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Axiom weights approximately 1101 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Renault 9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Axiom | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Isuzu | Renault |
Model | Axiom | 9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 47 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1923 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 38 L |