2004 Isuzu Axiom vs. 1982 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Axiom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (250 HP) has 206 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Axiom weights approximately 946 kg more than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (335 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Axiom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Axiom | 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
Make | Isuzu | Suzuki |
Model | Axiom | SJ 410 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 335 Nm | 74 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1816 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2040 mm |