2004 Isuzu Axiom vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 MCC ForTwo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Axiom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (250 HP) has 210 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Axiom weights approximately 1086 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 MCC ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (334 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (100 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Axiom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Axiom | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Isuzu | MCC |
Model | Axiom | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 40 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 100 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1816 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1810 mm |