2004 Isuzu Axiom vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Axiom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (250 HP) has 151 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Axiom weights approximately 578 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (334 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Axiom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Axiom | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Axiom | CU-X |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1923 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 80 L |