2004 Isuzu Axiom vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Axiom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Axiom would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Axiom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (250 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (168 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (334 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (232 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Axiom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Axiom | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Isuzu | Citroen |
| Model | Axiom | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
