2004 Isuzu Axiom vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Axiom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Axiom would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (250 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ranger. (207 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Axiom weights approximately 152 kg more than 2010 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (334 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ranger. (322 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Axiom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Axiom | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Isuzu | Ford |
| Model | Axiom | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 207 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1816 kg | 1664 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3198 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 74 L |
