2004 Isuzu Axiom vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Axiom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Axiom would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP) has 298 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Axiom weights approximately 9 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS-V.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. (334 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Axiom.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Axiom | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Isuzu | Cadillac |
| Model | Axiom | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 548 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 747 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1923 kg | 1914 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1884 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 68 L |
