2004 Isuzu Axiom vs. 2013 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2013 GMC Acadia is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Axiom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Axiom would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Acadia (284 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Acadia weights approximately 387 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Acadia (366 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Axiom. (335 Nm). This means 2013 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Axiom.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Axiom | 2013 GMC Acadia | |
| Make | Isuzu | GMC |
| Model | Axiom | Acadia |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 284 HP |
| Torque | 335 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1816 kg | 2203 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5101 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2003 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1846 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 83 L |
