2004 Isuzu Axiom vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Axiom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Axiom would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Axiom weights approximately 431 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Countryman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (334 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Axiom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Axiom | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Isuzu | Mini |
Model | Axiom | Countryman |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1816 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 47 L |