2004 Isuzu D-MAX vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Isuzu D-MAX is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu D-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu D-MAX (129 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu D-MAX should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 945 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu D-MAX | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
| Model | D-MAX | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2290 mm |
