2004 Isuzu D-MAX vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2004 Isuzu D-MAX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu D-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu D-MAX. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu D-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 745 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2004 Isuzu D-MAX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu D-MAX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu D-MAX (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2004 Isuzu D-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu D-MAX | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | D-MAX | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2350 mm |