2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 495 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
Model | Rodeo | XK |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 290 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 106 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 63 L |