2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 1962 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 191 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 850 kg more than 1962 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 1962 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
| Model | Rodeo | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2060 mm |
