2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (205 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 354 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (290 Nm). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
| Model | Rodeo | 240 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3163 cc | 3442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 208 HP |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.1:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1874 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 54 L |
