2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
Make | Isuzu | Matra-Simca |
Model | Rodeo | M25 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 363 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |