2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 650 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (439 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Isuzu | Land Rover |
| Model | Rodeo | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 282 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 439 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2550 mm |
