2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 172 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (78 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 806 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (185 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Isuzu | Renault |
Model | Rodeo | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 78 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 185 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 18.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 3.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 50 L |