2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2006 Jaguar XJ8
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar XJ8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 (300 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 80 kg more than 2006 Jaguar XJ8.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XJ8 (420 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 2006 Jaguar XJ8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2006 Jaguar XJ8 | |
Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
Model | Rodeo | XJ8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 420 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 17.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 85 L |