2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 112 more horse power than 2006 Volvo C70. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 92 kg more than 2006 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volvo C70. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
Model | Rodeo | C70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1698 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 62 L |