2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2006 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC70 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo XC70 (408 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 55 kg more than 2006 Volvo XC70.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC70 (541 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 2006 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2006 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
| Model | Rodeo | XC70 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 408 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 541 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |
