2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2008 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2008 Nissan Micra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2008 Nissan Micra. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 698 kg more than 2008 Nissan Micra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Micra. (153 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2008 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
Model | Rodeo | Micra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 153 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 46 L |