2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 895 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Isuzu | Renault |
Model | Rodeo | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1149 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 105 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 50 L |