2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2008 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 149 more horse power than 2008 Volkswagen Caddy. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2008 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 662 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Caddy. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Caddy. (148 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2008 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Isuzu | Volkswagen |
Model | Rodeo | Caddy |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 101 HP |
Torque | 334 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1128 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |