2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs. 2008 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2008 Volkswagen Eos. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2008 Volkswagen Eos.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Eos. (281 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Eos.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | 2008 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volkswagen |
| Model | Rodeo | Eos |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 334 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 55 L |
